TLDR: 10x space company play; currently massively undervalued (extremely high chance of achieving 10x goal in 1 decade, moderately high chance of achieving within 5 years or less depending on broad sector performance).
To give you some background about me – I’ve been invested in the space industry for a few years now. As many of you probably know from $RKLB and $SPCE, there has been a massive space run up to the SpaceX IPO. My most dominant position had been $LUNR, while also playing $PL, $BKSY, and $RDW when the time was appropriate. Now my most dominant position has shifted to $FLY.
—
What is Firefly Aerospace? What can they do?
Firefly Aerospace is a commercial space company.
Elytra and Ocula: These are Firefly’s “Multi-Mission Orbital Vehicles” (as they like to call them). Elytra handles “payload delivery, imaging, long-haul communications, and domain awareness across cislunar space.” Seems like Eltrya can also help position, service, and de-orbit satellites. Ocula is essentially a modification to Elytra specializing in advanced lunar imaging services.
Blue Ghost: Firefly’s lunar lander, and the first commercial lunar lander to successfully touch down on the moon.
Alpha: Firefly’s small-lift rocket. Its mission history is a bit of a mixed bag – some failures, but some great successes. Most notably, it successfully received a mission order and completed it within 24 hours; it’s carved a bit of a niche out for itself thanks to that. Most Alpha missions are national security / defense focused. It likely doesn’t pick up a lot of commercial contracts because it isn’t as cost effective as F9 or electron, and doesn’t have the track record.
Eclipse: Firefly’s medium-lift rocket, currently in development. 16,000 kg of capacity. Reusable. Built in partnership with Northrop Grumman (key point here). Launch timeline TBD.
—
Firefly Advantages / Catalysts & Longterm Trends:
National Security.
Firefly has DEEP national security / military industrial connections. Joint development on a rocket with Northrop Grumman is already massive. There is no future where Firefly’s med-lift rocket gets no missions / contracts. Legacy military connections will favor this rocket over alternatives. Lockheed Martin has already picked Firefly’s Aerospace’s Alpha rocket in order to launch a bunch of their spacecraft, despite Alpha not at all being the most competitive option. The CEO of Firefly also used to work for both Northrop and Raytheon.
The US has already begun to pump billions upon billions into space, be it for “Golden Dome” or other initiatives. Recently, Firefly acquired SciTec, which has multiple Golden Dome oriented contracts already, including FORGE and an AFRL contract. As the commercial space company positioning itself for a national security focus, there’s a huge opportunity here.
Lunar Dominance.
When it comes to Lunar Landers, Firefly and Intuitive Machines are the two dominant companies right now, with Blue Origin maybe being a competitor, though BO's lander is unproven. If you look at NASA’s C.L.P.S. contracts, it’s majority Firefly, IM, and BO.
I think noting the positioning between IM and Firefly here is important.
There’s a reason why when people think of lunar commercialization and dominance, they normally think about Intuitive Machines. IM has gone heavy into the MOON play. However, as seen by the most recent LTV contract wins (out of 3 companies, IM was the only company that got nothing), gov agencies are seeming